MKBHD says yes to Google Glass, no to the metaverse – TechCrunch

If you happen to’ve ever searched on YouTube for a evaluation of the most recent iPhone or electrical automobile, then you definately’ve most likely encountered Marques Brownlee. Since he began his channel MKBHD as a young person in 2009, Brownlee has amassed 15.8 million subscribers for his in-depth, but approachable tech movies. He’s even scored interviews with Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Invoice Gates and Barack Obama, and to high all of it off, he’s knowledgeable final frisbee participant (the previous president even complimented his “unbelievable hops.”)

However maybe Brownlee’s most spectacular accomplishment is his means to stay related over 10 years into his on-line video profession with out shedding his viewers’s belief. And as short-form video content material turns into a necessity for any creator, Brownlee has seamlessly transitioned to TikTok, the place he made one of many solely good April Fools’ Day pranks.

We caught up with Brownlee at VidCon, the place he was serving to Discord promote the beta take a look at of its server subscriptions (be careful, Patreon). In a dialog with maybe probably the most well-known tech reviewer — sorry, different TechCrunch writers — the 28-year-old web star instructed us about transitioning to TikTok, his views on the metaverse and why Google Glass deserves a redemption arc.

This interview has been condensed for readability.

TC: It’s not simple to make TikToks or YouTube shorts if you made it large on YouTube with 20-ish-minute movies. How do you go about making shorter content material on these new platforms? 

MB: I take into consideration this loads. I see ways in which I don’t like doing it, like individuals repurposing different content material and turning it into short-form content material. I might a lot quite make native content material for every platform. After we first began making shorts, it was a problem. I used to be like, how do I actually minimize this right down to 60 seconds or much less? I feel my first three shorts are 59.8 seconds lengthy. We discovered that after particularly deciding to spend time on TikTok, then attending to know what works nicely, helped us make stuff native to the platform higher.

With so many new creator applications throughout platforms, what does the pie chart of your revenue as a creator appear to be?

I’d say it’s about 50% YouTube’s built-in advert mannequin and 50% every part else — that features our merch retailer, different offers we do and issues like that. However the bread and butter for therefore lengthy has been the movies. It’s only a well-oiled machine. We don’t actually take into consideration overhead, we simply know that movies can and can carry out, which is … thanks, YouTube!

Regardless that short-form video has grow to be extraordinarily in style, nobody’s actually found out methods to monetize it but — do you’ve gotten any ideas on how which may work?

I don’t have a solution, and anybody who claims to have a solution might be mendacity. It makes a lot sense that short-form video can explode. The numbers that we see usually are not the identical because the numbers elsewhere. You understand, 20 million views on TikTok may be very completely different from 20 million views on YouTube. After we discuss monetizing movies, monetization on YouTube is tied to the video since you made the selection [to watch the video]. You noticed the thumbnail, you frolicked there, that was on you. That transaction works. However shorts are simply completely completely different. I don’t know methods to tie that collectively and make {that a} good, neat monetization resolution.

You’ve stayed related as a tech reviewer for over 10 years — how do you stability staying true to your perspective whereas additionally remaining accessible?

I attempt to be as clear as attainable about what I like and don’t like. It’s subjective. However whether or not somebody agrees with my desire in a bit of tech nearly doesn’t matter. I attempt to put myself into the sneakers of the viewer and say what I might need them to know in the event that they had been going to purchase the factor.

What developments in expertise are you most enthusiastic about?

I feel AR/VR is one all of our eyes are on proper now. It’s enjoyable as a result of for me, probably the most fascinating beginnings of latest tech are if you get a product that truly is meant to assist individuals or ship a brand new expertise, and I feel we’re proper about to start out seeing merchandise which are like, the killer app, like actually fascinating and bringing individuals in. We had Google Glass, we had loopy stuff previously, however I feel we’re about to see a bunch of cool stuff.

What do you consider the thought of the metaverse?

I get what individuals see in it. I get why Fb — or, Meta — needs to have a giant stake in it. However on the similar time, it has to have a goal. Now we have to wish to do the brand new factor for a motive, and I’m nonetheless in search of that motive.

Yeah, taking part in video video games in VR is one factor, however hanging out with associates in VR and going to work in VR is a tougher promote.

There’s some “Prepared Participant One”-type vibes typically the place it’s like, “what would it not imply if we didn’t should go to the assembly?” However it’s additionally not that tough to only do the factor we usually do. I’m in search of a motive to essentially wish to do that stuff. I give new stuff a shot, as a result of that’s my job. I give it an opportunity. However I feel we’re possibly getting ready to getting a bunch extra fascinating solutions to that query.

Meta’s VR {hardware} is enjoyable to play with, however I don’t wish to stay in it.

It’s simply one other cool piece of tech to play with, and there’s plenty of cool tech to play with already. It’s not going to get that mass adoption that I’m positive Meta is hoping for.

Do you suppose AR will likely be extra accessible to individuals than VR?

That’s the place I discover it best to see helpful use circumstances. I keep in mind the Google Glass days, and as loopy as that product was, having turn-by-turn navigation directions simply within the nook of your imaginative and prescient when you’re strolling by way of an unfamiliar metropolis may be very helpful. Little stuff like that, I truly discovered actually useful, at its core. The {hardware} was previous, and that’s 10 years in the past, so clearly tech has gotten loads higher since then. However I feel AR is less complicated for me to see as a future.

What firms do you suppose are doing AR nicely?

Clearly the iPhone and lidar. Functionally, it’s actually good, however it doesn’t do something helpful. Yeah, I can put a sofa in a room and see what it seems like, however I’m nonetheless in search of that “gotta have it” factor.

Is there any tech that you simply suppose was helpful, however didn’t make it? 

Google Glass is the proper reply. Ten years in the past, strolling right into a bar with a digicam in your face was insane, and now Snapchat simply made a pair of glasses with the digicam proper on it. It’s far more acceptable.

There are plenty of privateness debates round wearable tech — do you’ve gotten any moral issues round this type of tech?

Effectively, you all the time hope it comes from a accountable firm that does accountable issues, which is why there’s concern with Meta. That’s all I’ll say about that! However yeah, it’s the identical as together with your telephone — if you happen to’re doing vital stuff in your telephone, there will likely be plenty of vital information there, so privateness will likely be vital. We hope that the businesses do the correct factor with that information.

Is there any piece of tech that you simply suppose extra individuals must be speaking about?

Non-Tesla EVs. They’re nearly there.

Share:

Leave a Reply

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings